Our Neighbourhood. Our Plan.

This is not about stopping development; it is about stopping a bad development. The proposal for 10471 No. 3 Road is a case of speculative "spot zoning" that violates the City's Official Community Plan, the brand-new zoning bylaw, and even its own Arterial Road policies, all while ignoring documented infrastructure and safety concerns. We are asking the City of Richmond to uphold the rules it created to protect all neighbourhoods.

Take Action Now: Key Planning Committee Meeting on July 8th

A critical Planning Committee meeting will be held on Tuesday, July 8, 2025, at 4:00 PM at City Hall. This is not the final public hearing, but it is the first and most important opportunity to influence the outcome. At this "Early Council Review," city staff will seek input from the committee to guide their entire technical review of the application. All residents are encouraged to send letters to the Mayor and Council referencing this meeting and application RZ 25-012598.

Pillar 1: It Breaks the Rules at Every Level

This is our most powerful, fact-based argument. The developer is asking for a wholesale exception to the planning framework that the City has just established.

Rezoning notice sign for a development proposal.

It Violates the Official Community Plan (OCP)

The OCP is the City's highest-level planning document. This project is so out of step with the City's vision that it requires a special amendment to the OCP.

  • Clear Designation: The property is designated "Neighbourhood Residential" under OCP Bylaw 9000.
  • Apartments Not Permitted: The City's own staff report confirms this designation "does not allow for apartments."
  • Flawed Justification: The application seeks to justify itself by referencing a future, speculative OCP update. Planning decisions must be based on current, adopted plans.

It Contradicts the Brand-New Zoning Bylaw

In response to provincial Bill 44, the City just rezoned this very property to "Small-Scale Multi-Unit Housing (RSM/L)," which permits a maximum of 12 units (if subdivided). The developer's proposal for 27 units is more than double the absolute maximum legal density.

  • Explicitly Not an Apartment: The City’s own official guide on this new zoning states the goal is to create "house-like development" and is "NOT an apartment building".
  • Requires "Spot-Zoning": This application isn't just asking for densification; it's asking for a massive exception to the newest rules, setting a dangerous precedent for the entire city.

It Fails to Meet Multiple Technical Requirements

The developer's own site plan is an admission of overdevelopment. It requires special variances because it fails to meet the City's own bylaw requirements for both Lot Coverage (proposing 48.9% where 40% is the maximum) and Parking Stalls (proposing 37 where 38 are required).

Pillar 2: Documented Harm to Neighbourhood Livability & Safety

Beyond the bylaw violations, this project will harm our community with verifiable impacts on schools and safety—concerns already on record with the City.

School Overcrowding Crisis

Our schools are at a breaking point. The Richmond School District's official data confirms Maple Lane Elementary is already operating over capacity (266 students for a 229 capacity), with no relief projected. Adding a 27-unit building, with 15 family-sized units, without a funded, concurrent plan for school expansion is irresponsible.

Traffic, Parking & Safety

The developer's plan for 37 parking stalls is insufficient and fails to meet the bylaw requirement. The City's own data shows 610 crashes occurred on this section of No. 3 Road between 2019-2023. Adding hundreds of new vehicle trips and forcing overflow parking onto quiet side streets where children play is an unacceptable safety risk.

Threat to Private Green Space & Public Parks

This development threatens the mature trees and valuable green space on this private lot, which contribute significantly to our neighbourhood's character. Losing this private green space to a high-density building would also increase population pressure on nearby public parks, like Maple Grove Park, which are not equipped to handle the sudden increase in usage.

Public Safety Risk: Breaching the Goldstream Place Cul-de-Sac

A major safety concern is the proposal's potential to create a new access route connecting the 27-unit apartment building directly to the quiet Goldstream Place cul-de-sac.

  • A Quiet Street at Risk: Goldstream Place is a small, family-friendly cul-de-sac where children play. The City's own report confirms they are reviewing a "pedestrian/bicycle connectivity between Goldstream Place and No. 3 Road" through the site.
  • Violating Safety Principles: Residents have formally petitioned the City, noting that "breaching the cul-de-sac leaves the entire neighborhood more vulnerable to crime". This design could violate established Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles, which aim to protect quiet residential areas from becoming thoroughfares.
  • Increased Traffic and Strangers: This new access would funnel residents and visitors from the 27-unit building through a street that was never designed for it, destroying its character and creating new safety and security risks.

Pillar 3: A Betrayal of the City's "Gentle Densification" Promise

This argument positions our community as the defender of the City's own stated strategy.

The "Gentle Densification" Promise

In response to Bill 44, the City of Richmond publicly committed to a strategy of "gentle densification" with "smaller, house-like development" that is "more complementary to the scale of Richmond's traditional single-family and duplex neighbourhoods".

The Official Definition

The City's own public information explicitly states that the new "Small-Scale Multi-Unit Housing" zoning for this property is "NOT an apartment building".

Our Position: We Support the Plan. This Proposal Undermines It.

To comply with provincial law, this lot was just rezoned to permit up to 12 homes (if subdivided). The developer is now asking for 27—more than double the established maximum density. This isn't about stopping density; it's about stopping an unreasonable, ad-hoc exception. We are asking Council to uphold not only the bylaws but the very promise the City just made to its residents.

Latest Updates

Stay informed about the campaign's progress. We will post important news here.

July 3, 2025

URGENT: Key Planning Committee Meeting on July 8th

A critical Planning Committee meeting will be held on Tuesday, July 8th at 4:00 PM at City Hall. This is the first and most important opportunity to influence the outcome. At this "Early Council Review," city staff will seek input from the committee to guide their entire technical review of the application. All residents are encouraged to send letters to the Mayor and Council referencing this meeting and application RZ 25-012598.

June 27, 2025

Community Website Launched!

We have launched this website to keep residents informed and provide tools for taking action. Please share this page with your neighbours.

June 10, 2025

Official Rezoning Notice Received

Residents received the official notice of rezoning application RZ 25-012598 from the City of Richmond. The public hearing date is still to be determined.

Frequently Asked Questions

Get the facts about the proposed development at 10471 No. 3 Road (File RZ 25-012598).

Supportive Documentation

Our arguments are based on official city bylaws and established design principles. Use these documents to inform yourself and reference them in your communications.

Expert Analysis & Defense

Read the full legal and planning analysis submitted to the city, detailing our fact-based opposition to the proposal.

Comprehensive Analysis

An overview of the opposition's strategy and how it evolved based on official documents and evidence.

Official City Planning Report

The city staff report for the July 8, 2025 Planning Committee meeting, containing the full application details, staff analysis, and all public correspondence.

Richmond News: Neighbours Oppose Rental Building

A Richmond News article covering the local opposition to the proposed 27-unit rental apartment building.

Official Community Plan (OCP) Bylaw 9000

The City's master plan for the future. The proposal violates the 'Neighbourhood Residential' designation in this law.

Richmond Zoning Bylaw 8500

The official city page detailing the 'Small-Scale Multi-Unit Housing' zoning this proposal violates.

Planning Committee Meeting Schedule

The official schedule for upcoming Planning Committee meetings, including agendas and minutes. Find the details for the critical July 8th meeting here.

BC Bill 44 - Housing Statutes Amendment Act

The provincial law that mandated gentle, 'missing middle' housing. This document proves the city has already complied with the law's requirements for this property. It is key to showing that the developer's 27-unit proposal violates the spirit of the law, which was for distributed density, not a concentrated apartment building.

Richmond Tree Protection Bylaw

The official bylaw that protects our urban forest by restricting tree removal and ensuring replacement.

Little Maples Preschool Status

Official contact page stating the preschool is full for the school year and operating a waitlist.

Richmond School District Placement Policy

Official registration page stating that placement in a student's catchment school cannot be guaranteed due to space limitations.

Richmond Schools Face Student Surge

A Richmond News article reporting on the unexpected surge of nearly 700 students, adding pressure to the already strained system.

Crime Prevention (CPTED) - RCMP

The guide from Canada's national police force outlining the core public safety principles for community design.

BC Housing Design and Construction Standards

The provincial standards for residential safety, including guidelines on limiting access points and avoiding unobserved pathways.

Your Voice is Essential: Take Action Now

Maximum participation at the upcoming Public Hearing is our primary goal. Use these tools to make your voice heard effectively.

1 Write to Mayor and Council (Most Important)

A high volume of clear, formal emails is the most powerful tool we have. Follow the steps below.

Step A: Personalize Your Message (Optional)

Add your personal concerns. Our AI will craft a unique, formal paragraph and add it to the letter, making your email stand out.

Step B: Copy Recipient Addresses

DevApps@richmond.ca, cityclerk@richmond.ca, mayorandcouncillors@richmond.ca

Step C: Review and Send Your Letter

Subject: Formal Opposition to Rezoning Application RZ 25-012598 (10471 No. 3 Road) Dear Mayor and Councillors, I am writing to state my formal opposition to rezoning application RZ 25-012598. This proposal violates the city's own Official Community Plan (OCP), which does not permit apartment buildings on this "Neighbourhood Residential" site. This project is not the "gentle density" the City promised. It is a massive overdevelopment, nearly seven times the density legally permitted under the new provincial rules. [INSERT PERSONALIZED PARAGRAPH HERE] I respectfully request that Council uphold the OCP and deny this application to protect the stability and safety of our community. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address]
Open in Email & Send

Don't forget to add your name and address at the end!

Sign the Petition

Add your name to the official petition that will be presented to City Council.

18signatures
250 Goal

Prepare to Speak

Use our AI assistant to turn personal concerns into powerful talking points for the public hearing.

Share This Page

Talk to your neighbours and ensure they understand the facts and how to help.